See Reviews & Write a Review

Full Script of Documentary

Introduction

There are some who believe that the events of September 11, 2001 were planned and executed by Zionist members of the governments of the United States, Israel, and others through collusion with the CIA, Mossad, and other global intelligence agencies and that there were no Muslims involved. The false flag event was employed to overthrow and/or destabilize legitimate governments in the middle east and south Asia.

(Show General Wesley Clark video – 2 minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTbg11pCwOc

The above video by General Wesley Clark has been taken down by YouTube. Review the following:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAnNJW9_KYA [3-22-1923 | 7:15] General W. Clark: "This is a memo of how we're going to take out seven countries in five years."

Dan Hanley’s Flying Resume

Captain Dan Hanley is the director of the global grassroots effort 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers, whose purpose is to show that there were no Muslim hijackers at the controls of the 9/11 aircraft but that the aircraft were electronically hijacked through employment of a system called the uninterruptible autopilot that enables a remote source to take complete control of the aircraft autopilot and flight management computers and guide it to its target. Once engaged, this system cannot be disconnected by the pilots.

Captain Hanley had a 35-year combined US naval aviation and civilian career as a professional pilot. It ended tragically in his illegal termination in direct violation of racketeering laws as a United Airlines B-777 captain in December 2003 as a result of speaking out about issues concerning the events of 9/11.

Having commenced flying at age 19 over 50 years ago in 1968 first as a civilian pilot flying the Cessna 150, 172, 182, Mooney Ranger, and twin-engine Piper Apache where he acquired his private, commercial, instrument, and multi-engine ratings by 1970.

After completion of a four-year degree in Applied Mathematics in 1973 and with the Vietnam war still raging, he had to make military service plans and chose naval aviation.

During initial naval flight training, he flew the T-34B Mentor, T-28 Trojan, and TS-2A Tracker aircraft receiving his Navy wings in 1974.

Over the course of the next ten years while attached to a fleet squadron, he flew the sophisticated P-3 Orion aircraft tracking Soviet submarines during the Cold War in the Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea.

In 1978, he was hired as a pilot at United Airlines and, over the course of the next 25 years, flew the B-737. 727, 767, 777 and Airbus 320 aircraft.

All totaled, over a 35-year pilot career span, he flew over 20,000 flight hours and has unequivocally stated, without reservation or embarrassment, that with all his flight experience, he could not have flown the 9/11 flight profiles and neither could the alleged hijackers. As you will see, there are other highly qualified and experienced pilots, both civilian and military, who back his assertions.

During Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror in the Soviet Union and thereafter, there was systematic political abuse of psychiatry based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem. It was called "psychopathological mechanisms" of dissent. It may come as a surprise to some that this process of discrediting and eliminating dissenting whistleblowing employees is widely prevalent in the United States today.

Captain Dan Hanley’s illegal medical grounding for life as a pilot in 2003 based on a fraudulent and illegal psychiatric diagnosis is not a unique case in the airline piloting profession. It is far from it. Among many pilots in the industry, it is called the nuclear device, the weapon of last resort used by management, the union, and the Federal Aviation Administration, and in some cases aircraft manufacturers, working in collusion to rid the pilot ranks of troublesome whistleblowers. If the airline cannot terminate the pilot on professional, medical, or other grounds, they employ this practice to eliminate the pilot. Pilots who speak out on such issues as aviation safety or security are quickly silenced through employment of this process. This practice has been prevalent in the airline industry for decades.

Another case in point is that of former Northwest Airlines DC-10 Captain Field McConnell who, in December 2006, was disclosing illegal modifications on Boeing commercial jet aircraft to his union, company management, and the Federal Aviation Administration. Having been removed from the flight schedule for doing so, the above-named parties were attempting to force Captain McConnell to undergo a psychiatric examination by an FAA appointed psychiatrist in Los Angeles, Dr. James Elliott, who was notorious for grounding pilots for life based on a false psychiatric diagnosis. Captain McConnell phone contacted Captain Dan Hanley during this time frame as he had learned of the demise of his career. After consulting with him regarding this illegal process, he voluntarily retired 9 years early so that he could serve as an expert witness in future litigation. The illegal modifications on jet aircraft that he was exposing was the installment of a system called the uninterruptible autopilot that he alleged was utilized on 9/11 to guide aircraft to their targets and will be discussed shortly.

There are countless other examples of this abuse and suppression that has occurred for decades within the piloting profession.

An extreme case of 9/11 pilot whistleblower suppression is given by former United Airlines Boeing 767 Captain Philip Marshall who had authored two books on 9/11 and was about to publish a third. Philip had mentioned to his neighbors that he was receiving death threats. Shortly thereafter, his family dog and two teenage children were found shot to death in his California home and Philip with a gunshot to his head. Police ruled it a murder-suicide. It was revealed that his 9/11 tell-all manuscript was missing from his home. You be the judge.

The expulsion of employees based on fraudulent psychiatric evaluations is not unique to the piloting profession. Anyone holding a professional certificate required for employment such as doctors, nurses, lawyers, accountants, government employees, etc. can be targets of elimination.

The aforementioned examples of illegal pilot terminations are but a few among many. Given these obvious harsh processes of eliminating airline pilot whistleblowers in the United States, can there be any doubt in your mind as to why so few pilots have spoken out about the crimes of 9/11?

9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers

As previously mentioned, in 2019, a global grassroots effort was established called 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers where Captain Hanley currently serves as director and international public spokesperson.

The goal of this organization is to recruit active and retired highly trained and experienced pilots, both military and civilian, who will agree to be deposed by lawyers asserting that, not only could the 9/11 hijackers not have flown the flight profiles, but that they could not have flown the profiles themselves.

The ultimate intent is to submit this testimony and other evidence to a US attorney in an attempt to compel a grand jury investigation into our assertions.

Additionally, much evidence and information has been forwarded to the US Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration but these organizations are currently stonewalling the efforts of 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers whose goal is to force a thorough investigation by these relevant government organizations. Why?

Official 9/11 Story

It has been almost 2 decades since 9/11 and a new generation has been born since then. To many, the events of that day are but faded horrifying memories of the past while to the new generation, fed propaganda and outright lies through their education as perpetuated by the bombardment of propaganda being spewed out daily by world governments and the corporate owned-and-controlled mainstream media, have sadly been led to believe the official narrative.

According to this official narrative, Osama bin Laden, living in a cave somewhere in the mountainous region of Afghanistan 8,000 miles from the United States and near death on dialysis suffering from kidney failure armed with a laptop and satellite phone managed somehow to command 19 angry Arab Muslim extremist armed with box cutters and who hated the American way of life to commandeer 4 large commercial jets they had never flown before while evading the most sophisticated air defense systems in the world for over an hour and fly 3 of them into buildings in New York City and Washington, DC. This story on its face is absurd and yet the bulk of the global populace fell for it. Why? Were Osama bin Laden and the 19 hijackers responsible for these heinous crimes against humanity? We think not.

Rex Tombs

Osama bin Laden had been placed on the FBI Most Wanted list for the embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 but not for the crimes of 9/11. Why not?

In April 2006 when FBI Public Spokesperson Rex Tombs was asked this question, he stated that the reason was due to the fact that quote “the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Osama bin Laden to 9/11” unquote. No hard evidence indeed.

Abbottabad Raid

And yet on May 1, 2011, under the orders of President Obama, the US military launched Operation Neptune Spear wherein 24 US Navy Seals flying in 2 Black Hawk helicopters conducted a night raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan with orders to take him dead or alive even though there was no hard evidence connecting him to the crimes of 9/11. He very easily could have been taken alive and testified before a jury in a US court of law but instead was extra judicially murdered having been shot in the face thus sealing his lips forever. Without having been captured alive we will never hear the testimony from a man who claimed to be innocent of the crimes of 9/11.

The bulk of the native American population was obviously elated that the terrorist, they had been led to believe
was responsible for the crimes of 9/11, was brutally killed without a trial.

(Show NYC video of elated crowds in the streets)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAU6S6ke36o NYC reacts to Osama bin Laden's death

9/11 Commission

The 9/11 Commission was established by President Bush in November 2002, over one year after 9/11 due to pressure exerted by the next-of-kin to do so. It did not constitute a criminal investigation. In fact, to date, there has never been a criminal investigation into the greatest crime ever committed on American soil in its history. Why not?

In December 2002, Bush appointed former Secretary of State and uber Zionist Henry Kissinger and former US senator George Mitchell to serve as chairmen. Less than a month later, however, both resigned potential conflicts of interest. Co-chairmen Tom Keane and Lee Hamilton replaced them.

It should be pointed out that during their examination of evidence, not one single pilot was permitted to testify before the commission as to the absurdity of the ludicrous notion that poorly trained and inexperienced hijackers who were trained mainly in light single-engine aircraft actually piloted the highly sophisticated and complex Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft that were hijacked on 9/11 where they allegedly performed spectacular aerial feats that even the most accomplished pilots could not have performed.

The commission was required to complete its work within 18 months -- a timetable that would have it issue its final report in the middle of a presidential election year -- though Mr. Bush said he hoped it would finish sooner.

The Commission proceeded to also ignore 70% of the next-of-kin families’ questions presented to them in search of answers.

Upon conclusion of the Commission’s work, co-chairmen Tom Keane and Lee Hamilton later admitted that due to the time constraints imposed and severe lack of funding, it was set up to fail. In fact, more government funds were allotted to the investigation of the space shuttle Challenger explosion and President Bill Clinton’s sexual indiscretions with Monica Lewinsky than was expended on the Commission…sad indeed…and this regarding the greatest crime ever committed on American soil in its history.

Uninterruptible Autopilot

Having been trained mainly in light single-engine aircraft with only a few hundred flight hours, the 9/11 hijackers were undertrained and too inexperienced to have flown the sophisticated and complex B-757/767 aircraft that day. Each of the three aircraft that struck buildings did so with military precision and on the first attempt.

A photo comparison of a Cessna 172, which weighs only one ton, with that of a B-767 weighing over 100 tons exemplifies the vast difference between the two aircraft. To fly the latter after having only flown the former would be akin to having your driver’s license for a little over a year in a small vehicle and climbing into a huge semi-tractor trailer truck that you had never driven before. The maneuverability and complexity of the two vehicles are vastly different.

Similarly, notice the glaringly obvious differences in the cockpit instrumentation of the two aircraft.

The Cessna aircraft instruments are of the old-fashioned round dial instrument design displaying limited information. There are a few radios, switches and knobs and only one engine instrument, the rpm indicator.

Compare this now to the complex cockpit of the B-767 where the instruments are comprised of modern-day CRT displays that provide a wealth of information that the hijackers would not comprehend having never flown the aircraft before.

Rather than a single engine RPM gauge, there are four engine instrument gauges for each engine. Once again, the hijackers would be unable to interpret the readings having never flown a jet engine aircraft before in their lives.

There are two control display units onboard the aircraft identified by the black squares located at the top of the center pedestal that are the primary navigation aids on the aircraft providing input to the flight management computer. Each computer display contains several pages of information that only an experienced B-757/767 pilot could interpret. These two displays are used in conjunction with a series of switches located on the glare shield of the aircraft. It is inconceivable to an experienced pilot that these hijackers could navigate the aircraft given the complexity of these systems.

Turning now to the hijackers themselves…

Mohammed Atta, the alleged ring leader of the hijackers, supposedly piloted American Airlines flight 77 that struck the north tower of the World Trade Center complex. A 32-year-old Egyptian, the flight profile was a straight-in approach from the north travelling at 465 miles per hour. At this closure rate, had the aircraft been but a few degrees off heading the aircraft would have missed the building entirely and yet struck the center of the building with pinpoint accuracy on the first attempt. Compare this again to climbing into a huge semi-tractor trailer truck that you had never driven before, accelerating to this speed, and driving it through a garage without scraping the sides of the truck.

Marwan al-Shehhi was the 23-year-old alleged hijacker from the United Arab Emirates that supposedly piloted United Airlines flight 175 that struck the south tower. At age 23, he was the youngest of the hijackers having only but a few hundred flight hours.

The aircraft approached the south tower from the south flying at a speed of 590 miles per hour, the fastest approach speed of the three aircraft that struck buildings.

Just twelve seconds before impact, the aircraft rolled into a thirty-degree bank precisely striking the building on the first attempt. Had this not occurred with exactly that point in time the aircraft would have missed the building entirely by 800 feet. Even the most experienced pilots licensed in the aircraft would find this maneuver extremely challenging at that speed and consequent closure rate and especially on the first attempt. And yet this unrated pilot accomplished this amazing aerial feat on his first try.

The smoking gun amongst the three hijackers is Hani Hanjour, a 29-year-old from Saudi Arabia who allegedly piloted American Airlines flight 77 that supposedly struck the Pentagon.

The purported profile flown by Hani Hanjour could not have been performed by the most experienced pilots in the world. The aircraft was reported to have conducted a descending and accelerating 330-degree corkscrew turn from 7000 feet west of the Pentagon to arrive precisely at ground level without striking the ground to hit the Office of Naval Intelligence at 530 miles per hour. This maneuver was replicated in a flight simulator. Highly experienced pilots could not perform this maneuver on successive attempts without crashing and yet, according to the official narrative, Hani Hanjour accomplished this amazing aerial feat on the first attempt with no B-767 aircraft experience training in light Cessna aircraft having only a few hundred hours of total flight time and having never flown a jet aircraft in his life.

Hanjour came to the states to receive flight training in the mid-90s before returning to Saudi Arabia. Prior to 9/11, he returned to commence flight training but was refused by his former training academy as he was such a poor student that that the school did not want to waste assets training him.

In August 2001, just one month prior to 9/11, Hanjour tried to rent a plane from Freeway Airport in Maryland; though he was declined after exhibiting difficulty controlling and landing a single-engine Cessna 172.

According the 9/11 Commission, Hanjour began his training “in earnest”. But in reality, Hanjour never finished coursework required to get his certificate to be able to fly a single-engine aircraft.

ABC News reported that, “He was trying for his private pilot’s license”, but according to one of his instructor’s, he “was a very poor student who skipped homework and missed flights.” The school’s attorney said that when Hanjour reapplied again later in 2000, “We declined to provide training to him because we didn’t think he was a good enough student when he was there in 1996 and 1997.” The school’s owner described him as a “weak student” who “was wasting our resources” He said “One of the first accomplishments of someone in flight school is to fly a plane without an instructor”.

We know that allegedly three aircraft struck buildings on 9/11 and yet none of the hijackers were qualified to have performed the maneuvers with such precision and on the first attempt at such excessive speeds having never flown a jet aircraft before.

How then was this accomplished? Let us turn to the history of remote-controlled aircraft for the answer.

Remote controlled aircraft technology has existed as far back as over 75 years ago in 1944 when, towards the end of World War II, the US military launched Operation Aphrodite. By gutting out old B-24 twin-engine bombers to lessen weight, these aircraft were then loaded with 30,000 pounds of Torpex, a highly incendiary compound.

https://youtu.be/FlrvWhkY2q0 1944 Military Operation Aphrodite Demonstrates Remote Control Of Aircraft Has Existed For 75 Years.

Pilots were required to make the takeoff but, once airborne, would bail out of the aircraft while an aircraft high overhead would remotely guide aircraft to their targets in Europe and crash them into enemy below. This was the first example of military remote-controlled drone aircraft.

It should be noted that John F. Kennedy’s older brother, Joe, was killed on one of these top-secret missions when, due to a malfunction, the aircraft blew up before he was able to bailout.

Forty years later, in 1984, due to rapidly advancing technology with the advent of the computer age, the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration conducted a joint crash test experiment in a remote location, to test crew and passenger survivability in the event of aircraft crash landing.

Using a large 4-engine jet aircraft, a B-720, and without pilots and passengers onboard, the aircraft was remotely guided to takeoff, fly around the traffic pattern and auto land six times, before being intentionally crash landed.

https://youtu.be/wNJNojsjNWY 1984 NASA/FAA Joint Crash Test Experiment Demonstrates Remote Control of a Commercial Jet Aircraft

Jumping ahead two decades to the mid-1990s, a system was developed and produced called the uninterruptible autopilot whose design purpose was to prevent would-be hijackers from commandeering a commercial jet aircraft in flight by remotely taking control of the aircraft autopilot and flight navigation systems and routing it to an airport where a safe auto landing could be made. Once this system is engaged, the pilots cannot disengage the autopilot or navigation systems by any means and are along for the ride. This same system could also be employed to fly aircraft into buildings. It should be noted that the navigation systems on today’s modern commercial jet aircraft was derived from cruise missile technology and is extremely accurate.

Proof that this system exists is given by a Wikipedia article entitled Boeing-Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Honeywell_Uninterruptible_Autopilot Uninterruptible autopilot

The article states that Boeing patented this system in 2006. While this is true, there is very strong proof to show that the system was developed and produced in the mid-90s prior to 9/11 and was employed to guide the aircraft to their targets. Hence, implying that there were no Muslim hijackers at the controls of the aircraft thus dispelling the 9/11 Commission absurd notion that they actually piloted the aircraft.

So, one must ask oneself…did the highly inexperienced hijackers pilot the aircraft into buildings or were the aircraft remotely guided via the uninterruptible autopilot system?

You be the judge.

Building Collapse

Never in the 100-year history of steel reinforced concrete high rise building fires has any ever collapsed due to fire. On 9/11, three did…the Twin Towers and Building 7.

The Twin Towers, constructed with over 200-tons of steel and 425 cubic yards of concrete, were dustified spewing debris as far as 300 feet from the building as the 110-story buildings collapsed identically to the surface in just 11 seconds leaving but a pile of debris one story tall. Built in 1973, these buildings, containing 400 tons of asbestos with an occupancy rate of just 50 percent, were antiquated white elephants, and scheduled for demolition earlier but the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey were clueless as to how to accomplish this without contaminating the air throughout the New York City area. The collapse of the buildings on 9/11 accomplished the task for them. As a result, an estimated 410,000 to 525,000 people, including more than 90,000 workers, were exposed to the toxic dust during the rescue, recovery and cleanup efforts that followed the attack. The official report stated that the collapses were due to jet aircraft impact damages and the fuel fires that ensued.

World Trade Center building 7, also known at the Solomon Building, was not struck by an aircraft and collapsed at 5:20 pm on the evening of 9/11 into its own footprint in less than 7 seconds at nearly the free fall acceleration of gravity. The official report stated that the collapse was due to a few small office fires.

(Need video of WTC 7 collapse)

Enter the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry

Established in 2019, a group of US lawyers created the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, combined legal hands with the biggest 9/11 whistleblowers in the world, and developed 57 compelling evidence packages that were presented to New York US Attorney Geoffrey Berman forcing him to convene a grand jury investigation into their allegations that the three buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. Among the many other witnesses that provided testimony and evidence included:

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Scientists

Firemen

William Rodriguez

University of Alaska Fairbanks report

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, comprised of over 3000 architects and engineers from around the world, are demanding an investigation into the collapse of the buildings on 9/11. Their expert witness testimony provides indisputable proof that, based on building design, it was structurally impossible for the Twin Towers and building 7 to have collapsed as they did.

(Videos Richard Gage)

Scientists

It has been shown that jet fuel burns at a temperature of 1500 degrees Fahrenheit. Steel melts at 2750 degrees Fahrenheit. And yet on 9/11, molten iron was seen spewing from the Twin Towers like lava. For months afterwards, firemen were wading in this molten steel in the debris field that melted boots. What could have possibly caused this?

A group of scientists from around the world gathered dust samples from the debris fields of the Twin Towers and building 7. Using the scientific method, they were able to conclusively prove beyond a shadow of doubt that nano thermite, a highly incendiary compound that burns at a temperature of over 4000 degrees Fahrenheit, was found throughout the debris field. They allege that this pre-planted substance was employed to melt steel beams and weaken the structure sufficiently to cause the collapse…hence a controlled demolition.

(Videos…Niels Harrit)

Firemen

At least 118 firemen have provided testimony that a series of explosions were heard both before and during the building collapse.

(Need 3 videos of firemen testimony)

William Rodriguez

William Rodriguez was a janitor in one of the Twin Towers responsible for maintaining the cleanliness of the stair well of the building. On 9/11, he was present in one of the 6 subbasement levels when the first aircraft struck the building. Having keys to the stairwell, he rushed outside to unlock doors for firemen and accompanied them up the stairs to aid in the rescue effort. Just prior to building collapse and after rescuing many people, William rushed outside and jumped under a truck as the building came down. A passerby who happened to notice this returned later with others to rescue him from the debris.

His heroic efforts were noted broadly by the media who touted him as “the hero of 9/11” and the “last man out”.

Upon learning of his story, President Bush invited him to the White House where he was presented a hero award. Surrounded by supporting politicians and the media, he was promised that movie and book deals would follow and was being encouraged to run for political office.

All of this fanfare vaporized when, appearing before a congressional hearing, he claimed that just prior to aircraft impact a huge explosion was heard and felt in the subbasement level beneath him. William has spent the past 20 years on a global speaking tour telling his story.

(Videos of Rodriguez)

University of Alaska Fairbanks report

A research team from the University of Alaska Fairbanks headed by Professor J. Leroy Hulsey conducted a four-year study examining the collapse of World Trade Center building 7.

The research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, it was simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, they supplemented their own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, they simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

The principal conclusion of the study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of the study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

The building was brought down by controlled demolition.

So, what is the status of the legally mandated grand jury investigation in New York City? It is being stonewalled by every relevant branch of government at present of course. To do otherwise would necessarily be acknowledging the fact that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition and not by jet aircraft impact damage and the fuel fires that ensued.

Government/Media Complicity

There are 193 countries on the planet and so few world leaders have spoken out about the obvious lies of 9/11 for over 19 years even though there is more than ample evidence on the internet and elsewhere to suggest that it was an inside job and not planned and executed by Osama bin Laden and 19 angry hijackers.

With the exception of former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, both of who claimed that Israel was responsible for the crimes, almost all others have remained silent. Why? Do these other leaders fear severe reprisals from western powers for speaking out? Surely, they are not ignorant of the facts.

The US government has been complicit in perpetuating the lies each year as well as the governments of other major nations of the world.

In 1983, there were over 50 independent news media outlets in the United States. That same year Israel launched the Hasbara Project in an effort to explain government policies and promote Israel in the face of negative press, and to counter what they saw as attempts at delegitimization of Israel. (Hasbara, it should be noted, is also a euphemism for propaganda). Today there are only 6 media conglomerates that control 96% of the news read and watched daily that have been infiltrated by Israeli and other Zionists at the highest levels of management spewing out propaganda and lies hourly to an unwary public audience.

Through complicity with the US and other government intelligence agencies, these news outlets have perpetuated the lies of 9/11 since the day that it occurred. How and why was this allowed to happen? We will now explore the overwhelming influence and control the Zionist nation state of Israel has on the US and other governments, the media and Hollywood, business and elsewhere from the federal level down to the state and local level.

The Zionist Movement

Semitism is a policy or predisposition favorable to Jews.

(Taken from a Global Research article)
https://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815) “Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East

According to a Global Research article, Zionism is a political ideology concerned with the reestablishment and the development and protection of a Jewish nation in what is now Israel. It was established as a political organization in 1897 under Theodor Herzl, and was later led by Chaim Weizmann.

Anti-Zionism is a political movement opposed to the reestablishment and protection of a Jewish nation in what is now Israel. An anti-Zionist does not oppose the Jewish people or religion but only the political ideology concerning the establishment of Greater Israel, or the lands extending from the Nile to the Euphrates. If the maneuver is successful, Israel will end up with all of the territories it conquered during the 1967 war, including all of the Golan Heights and Jerusalem and most of the Palestinian Territories, including the best sources of water and agricultural land. Greater Israel would create a number of proxy states. It would include parts of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, the Sinai, as well as parts of Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

When viewed in the current context, including the siege on Gaza, the Zionist Plan for the Middle East bears an intimate relationship to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the 2006 war on Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya, the ongoing wars on Syria, Iraq and Yemen, not to mention the political crisis in Saudi Arabia.

The “Greater Israel” project consists in weakening and eventually fracturing neighboring Arab states as part of a US-Israeli expansionist project, with the support of NATO and Saudi Arabia. In this regard, the Saudi-Israeli rapprochement is from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s viewpoint a means to expanding Israel’s spheres of influence in the Middle East as well as confronting Iran. Needless to say, the “Greater Israel” project is consistent with America’s imperial design.

Taken in this context, given the countries that were illegally invaded without warrant post-9/11 based on lies, both Israel and the United States had an imperialistic motive and the means to execute the events of 9/11. Did Osama bin Laden? We think not.

AIPAC

Established in 1951, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, AIPAC, is the most powerful lobbying group in the United States that advocates pro-Israel policies to the Congress and the Executive Branch of the United States and has over 100,000 members, 17 regional offices, and a vast pool of financial donors. The group does not raise funds for political candidates itself, but its members raise money for candidates through political action committees unaffiliated with AIPAC and by other means. It has an extremely strong stranglehold on all levels and branches of government with its overbearing financial power and consequent political influence.

AIPAC has maintained high levels of participation from Democratic and Republican lawmakers alike and is the only foreign lobby not registered as a foreign agent in accordance with the Foreign Agents Registration Act thereby not having to disclose their relationship with the foreign government and information about related activities and finances.

Since 1985, the United States has provided nearly $3 billion in grants annually to Israel, with Israel being the largest annual recipient of American aid from 1976 to 2004 and the largest cumulative recipient of aid since World War II, a whopping $142.3 billion, which is more than half of US global aid.

Former 6-term Democratic Congresswoman from Georgia Cynthia McKinney described how political officials are encouraged by AIPAC members to sign a pledge of allegiance to Israel. To not do so is a kiss of death for a politician’s career. Take a listen to what she had to say.

https://youtu.be/GqtmZrrbbL0 US lawmakers forced to support Israel
(begin at 2-minute mark)

Former Ohio US Congressman Jim Traficant similarly agreed with this assessment before his death in 2014

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_Zhe2UUfcw Former Ohio Rep. Jim Traficant "Israel Controls America"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ys6UKPeWS4U James Traficant - AIPAC Runs America's Foreign Policy PT 3 of 5

As currently does Minnesota US Congresswoman Ilhan Omar:

(Need video of Ilhan Omar’s statements)

The Democratic House leadership released a statement accusing Omar of "engaging in deeply offensive anti-Semitic tropes." The Jewish Democratic Council of America also denounced her statements. After receiving death threats on her and her family and other harsh criticisms from many politicians, both Democrat and Republican, and the media, Ilhan Omar subsequently retracted her statements.

A prime example of the 535 members of Congress’s undying and strong support of Israel is given when, addressing a joint session of Congress on March 3, 2015, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu received no less than 28 roaring standing ovations in 47 minutes from both chambers of Congress.

https://youtu.be/wRf1cdw4IAY Benjamin Netanyahu Speech to Congress 2015 [FULL] | Today on 3/3/15 | New York Times

Given this intense political pressure on US politicians from a foreign lobby to fully support Israel’s foreign policies regarding the middle east plus their signature on a pledge of allegiance to the same, one must ask where their loyalties actually stand. Unanimously, they stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the Executive branch in full support of Israel’s Greater Israel Project while ignoring the gross atrocities and heinous crimes against humanity in Gaza.

This same legislative body collectively remained ominously silent in the aftermath of 9/11 as the US and the west launched its illegal invasions in the middle east countries encompassed by Greater Israel’s biblically prophesized promise lands without warrant based on the lies of 9/11 resulting ultimately in the ninth crusade against Muslims, which killed, maimed, or displaced millions.

Project for a New American Century

Established in 1997 by renegade Zionist Jews William Crystal and Robert Kagan, both close personal friends of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Project for a New American Century, or PNAC, was a DC-based Zionist neoconservative think tank that focused on US foreign policy whose stated goal was to promote American global leadership. The organization stated that "American leadership is good both for America and for the world," and sought to build support for a “Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity."

Of the twenty-five people who signed PNAC's founding statement of principles, ten went on to serve in the administration of US President George W. Bush, including war hawks Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz. It should be noted that PNAC played a key role in shaping the foreign policy of the Bush Administration, particularly in building support for the illegal and unwarranted invasion of Iraq.

In 1998, Kristol and Kagan advocated an illegal regime change in violation of international law in Iraq stating that American policy "cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council” and on January 26th a joint letter was sent to President Bill Clinton insisting on the illegal overthrow of the Saddam Hussein government. A little over five years later, based on the admitted lie that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, PNAC got its wish and millions of innocent Iraqis died, were maimed, or displaced from their homeland as a direct result of this blatant lie.

In a PNAC paper released exactly one year prior to 9/11 entitled “Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources for a New Century” urgency was expressed in a drastic increase in military defense spending to defend the Homeland and winning of "multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars. The 90-page report went on to say "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." One year later, PNAC got its wish of a new Pearl Harbor on September 11, 2001 as a result of the false flag attack on America. The rest is history.

Was this merely a coincidence? We think not.

Larry Silverstein

New York real estate tycoon Larry Silverstein is a Zionist and personal friend of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

In January 2001, Silverstein made a $3.2 billion bid to lease-purchase the World Trade Center. Silverstein's negotiated bid was finalized on July 24, 2001, less than 2 months prior to 9/11. The Port Authority agreed to lease the twin towers to Larry Silverstein and he agreed to pay the equivalent of $3.2 billion over the next 99 years. This was the first time in the complex's 31-year history that it had changed management.

The lease agreement applied to One, Two, Four, and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet of retail space. Silverstein put up just $14 million of his own money to secure the deal. The agreement gave Silverstein, as leaseholder, the right and the obligation to rebuild the structures if destroyed.

The insurance policies for World Trade Center buildings WTC 1. 2, 4 and 5 had a collective face amount of $3.55 billion. Following the September 11, 2001, attacks, Silverstein sought to collect double the face amount to $7.1-billion on the basis that the two separate airplane strikes into two separate buildings constituted two separate occurrences. The total payout was $4.57-billion on a $14-million investment.

Silverstein usually spent his mornings in breakfast meetings at Windows on the World restaurant on top of the World Trade Center North Tower with new tenants in the building. However, the morning of September 11th attacks his wife insisted that he attend a medical appointment. Due to the appointment, he escaped almost certain death.

Some refer to Silverstein as “Lucky Larry”. Was it purely coincidental that he just happened to lease the buildings less than 2 months prior to 9/11 and miss his morning meeting? We think not.

At 5:20 pm in the evening of 9/11, Silverstein jointly with the New York Fire Department, made the decision to "pull it" regarding World Trade Center building 7 which was then the headquarters of the crisis and disaster command center for the mayor of New York City. The 47-story building collapsed nearly symmetrically in its own footprint at nearly the free fall acceleration of gravity in less than 7 seconds. The term “Pull it” is usually employed in the controlled demolition of a building.

(YouTube videos)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZlmHvd_RZU (no longer available)
https://youtu.be/7ZiMG84hws0 Building weakened by WTC attack collapses

So, what is wrong with this picture?

It would normally take weeks, if not months, to pre-wire a 47-story building with explosives to bring it down, which strongly suggests that the explosives were pre-planted well before 9/11 and that the building collapse was caused by a controlled demolition.

You be the judge.

Michael Chertoff

Zionist Michael Chertoff, a dual US/Israeli citizen whose mother was a founding Mossad agent, has long-standing ties to the State of Israel and Israeli intelligence and was appointed by Bush to head the criminal division of the Department of Justice as Assistant Attorney General just prior to 9/11 serving from 2001 to 2003. He personally supervised and controlled the entire FBI non-investigation of 9-11. He also co-authored the Patriot Act, which, in many cases, stripped US citizens of many of their rights under the constitution.

Immediately after the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings whose debris field was the greatest crime scene in America history, in direct violation of protocol, Chertoff ordered the entire area cordoned off and the steel shipped to China and sold at below market rates without critical forensic evidence having been collected at the crime scene. Why?

On the morning of 9/11, five Israeli citizens were seen by a resident nearby dancing and celebrating alongside an Urban Moving van the collapse of the Twin Towers as they filmed the event from the street. The plate number was traced and around 4 pm on Sept. 11, the van was spotted on a service road off Route 3, near New Jersey's Giants Stadium. A police officer pulled the van over, finding five men, between 22 and 27 years old, in the vehicle. The men were taken out of the van at gunpoint and handcuffed by police. The driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers, "We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem."

Two weeks after their arrest, an immigration judge ordered them to be deported but FBI and CIA officials in Washington put a hold on the case.

The five men were held in detention for more than two months. Some of them were placed in solitary confinement for 40 days, and some of them were given as many as seven lie-detector tests.

The men denied that they had been working for Israeli intelligence out of the New Jersey Urban moving company, and Ram Horvitz, their Israeli attorney, dismissed the allegations as "stupid and ridiculous."

Israeli and U.S. Justice department officials worked out a deal — and after 71 days, the five Israelis were taken out of jail, put on a plane, and deported back home. Why?

https://youtu.be/rStJ5BgadPs The Five Dancing Israelis - 9/11/2001 - Our Purpose Was To Document The Event

https://youtu.be/kJmSCi7mY5w 911 Five Dancing Israelis Moving Van on Israeli TV

You be the judge.

Dov Zakeim

Dov Zakheim, a dual US/Israeli citizen and a Zionist, served in some capacity in the US Department of Defense since the Reagan era until his departure in 2003. He was purportedly the mastermind of 9/11.

In 1998, he signed the letter to then President Clinton calling for an invasion of Iraq to illegally overthrow the legitimate government of Saddam Hussein.

(Photo of document)

Prior to 9/11, he was the CEO of Systems Planning Corporation that developed and produced a system called the Flight Termination System, which enables a remote source to take complete control of an airborne vehicle and fly it to its target. This system incorporates the uninterruptible autopilot that was previously mentioned which it proudly sold Flight Termination Systems for commercial jet planes.

The Flight Termination System pod is cylindrical in shape.

There were four independent photos taken of United Airlines flight 175 that struck the south tower that day by CNN, Carmen Taylor, Evan Fairbanks, and Pavel Hlava. Beneath the fuselage is a clearly distinguishable pod resembling the Flight Termination System.

The under belly of a B-767 aircraft is smooth and does not contain this pod leading one to the conclusion that, if these photographs were authentic, this aircraft could not have been United Airlines flight 175.

Dov Zakheim was a signatory in September 2000, exactly one year prior to 9/11, to the Project for a New American Century document “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” which said that a “New Pearl Harbor” would be required for various military adventures in the future. One year later, their wish was granted with the “new Pearl Harbor” event of 9/11.

During the 2000 US Presidential election campaign, Zakheim served as a foreign policy advisor to George W. Bush as part of a group led by Condeleeza Rice that called itself The Vulcans.

Just four months prior to 9/11, Zakheim was appointed by Bush to serve as Under Secretary of Defense as comptroller of the Pentagon. The day prior to 9/11, then Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced that $2.3-trillion was missing from the Department of Defense budget in unaccounted transactions. On September 11th, American Airlines flight 77 struck the Pentagon’s Naval Intelligence Center that housed the Office of Budget Analysis killing over 30 auditors of the 50 that were investigating the missing $2.3-trillion and destroying all the records of the investigation. Was this all purely coincidental? We think not.

Conclusions

2977 innocent victims were brutally murdered in the United States on 9/11 but this number pales in comparison to the losses of human life elsewhere on the planet.

(Video clips of 9/11)

As a direct result of the lies of 9/11, millions of Muslims have been killed, maimed, or displaced globally from their homelands in the middle east and south Asia as a direct result of the horrific crime of 9/11, a crime that Muslims did not commit.

(Appropriate video clips of troops/bombings)

Since 9/11, the Holy Prophet Mohammad has been slandered, the Quran desecrated, Islam demonized, and Muslims worldwide persecuted as a direct result of the lies of 9/11 and yet the global population of 1.8-billion Muslims has been largely silent as this carnage and persecution has occurred. Why?

(Video clips of the four items above)

There is a wealth of information contained in this video, on the internet, and elsewhere to prove that Osama bin Laden and his group of 19 Muslim hijackers did not commit the crimes of 9/11 but that it was planned and executed by rogue Zionist members of the governments of Israel, the United States, and others.

One must ask who had the motive and the means to carry out such heinous attacks. Surely not a frail man living in a cave in the mountainous regions of Afghanistan 8000 miles from the US.

(Photo of bin Laden)

Where has the Muslim leadership been through all of this? Why have all remained in this state of passivity and silence? Is it the overwhelming fear of reprisals for speaking out?

(Photos of Imams)

The horrors of the ninth crusade have come and gone leaving in its wake much sadness, death and destruction. It is hopeful that this video presentation will awaken the many that have been sleeping through the nightmare. Pray for world peace.